Multi live

This commit is contained in:
Ethan O'Brien
2026-08-11 14:41:28 -05:00
parent 75613dafb0
commit 27d7b8de82
18 changed files with 5650 additions and 83 deletions
+61 -1
View File
@@ -7,11 +7,33 @@ pub fn routes(cfg: &mut web::ServiceConfig) {
cfg.service(
web::scope("/chat")
.route("/home", web::post().to(home))
.route("/talk/get_stamp", web::get().to(get_stamp))
.route("/talk/start", web::post().to(start))
.route("/talk/end", web::post().to(end))
);
}
// The stamps this account owns. ew does not track stamp unlocks, so everyone has the
// masterdata initial set — the same list /chat/home reports, deliberately from one
// source so the two endpoints can never disagree.
fn owned_stamp_ids() -> JsonValue {
databases::INITIAL_CHAT_STAMPS.clone()
}
// GET /api/chat/talk/get_stamp (Protocol.send_get_stamp, FuncId.GET_STAMP).
// RecvGetStampRData carries a single `master_chat_stamp_ids` array, which its Notify()
// feeds to CallOnUpdateChatStampListNotify — the same sink RecvChatHomeRData uses, so
// the stamp picker ends up with whatever this returns. The client sends no parameters.
//
// This endpoint appears in neither official capture (0 hits across the 288MB JP and
// 1.4GB EN logs), so the shape is taken from the client class and the contents from the
// /chat/home captures that do exist and carry the same field.
async fn get_stamp(Login(_key): Login) -> impl Responder {
Api(Some(object!{
"master_chat_stamp_ids": owned_stamp_ids()
}))
}
pub fn add_chat(id: i64, num: i64, chats: &mut JsonValue) -> bool {
for data in chats.members() {
if data["chat_id"] == id && data["room_id"] == num {
@@ -48,7 +70,7 @@ async fn home(Login(key): Login) -> impl Responder {
Api(Some(object!{
"progress_list": chats,
"master_chat_room_ids": rooms,
"master_chat_stamp_ids": [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,11001003,22001001,33001001,44001002],
"master_chat_stamp_ids": owned_stamp_ids(),
"master_chat_attachment_ids": []
}))
}
@@ -75,3 +97,41 @@ async fn end(Session { key, body }: Session) -> impl Responder {
Api(Some(array![]))
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
// Verbatim from an official /api/chat/home capture (JP log, the 65-occurrence
// baseline seen on accounts that had earned no extra stamps yet). Both the JP and EN
// chat_stamp tables reproduce it exactly from _initialStamp, which is what lets
// get_stamp serve masterdata instead of a hardcoded literal.
const OFFICIAL_INITIAL_STAMPS: [i64; 97] = [
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,
31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,
59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,
85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,11001003,22001001,33001001,44001002
];
#[test]
fn the_initial_stamp_set_matches_official() {
let ids: Vec<i64> = owned_stamp_ids().members().map(|s| s.as_i64().unwrap()).collect();
assert_eq!(ids, OFFICIAL_INITIAL_STAMPS.to_vec());
// Order matters: the official list is masterdata order, not sorted (the 11xxxxxx
// band trails the small ids).
assert_eq!(ids.first(), Some(&1));
assert_eq!(ids.last(), Some(&44001002));
// The gaps are real - 18, 42 and 47 are not initial stamps.
for missing in [18, 42, 47] {
assert!(!ids.contains(&missing), "{missing} should not be an initial stamp");
}
}
#[test]
fn get_stamp_and_chat_home_cannot_disagree() {
// Both endpoints read the one source; this is what stops /chat/home's list and
// the stamp picker's list from drifting apart.
assert_eq!(owned_stamp_ids(), *databases::INITIAL_CHAT_STAMPS);
assert!(!owned_stamp_ids().is_empty());
}
}